Fruitland High School
501 Iowa Ave Fruitland ID, 83619, Payette County Phone: 208-452-4411 Ranking: (57 out of 151, top 38%)* Type: Regular High School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12 School District: Fruitland School District 373 Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 25 | 25 | 27 | 31 | 29 | 29 | 31 | |||||||
Total Students: | 473 | 470 | 487 | 494 | 494 | 504 | 513 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 123 | 26.0% | 120 | 25.5% | 126 | 25.9% | 135 | 27.3% | 126 | 25.5% | 122 | 24.2% | 129 | 25.1% |
Grade 10: | 125 | 26.4% | 121 | 25.7% | 131 | 26.9% | 125 | 25.3% | 120 | 24.3% | 127 | 25.2% | 139 | 27.1% |
Grade 11: | 113 | 23.9% | 117 | 24.9% | 117 | 24.0% | 112 | 22.7% | 124 | 25.1% | 129 | 25.6% | 137 | 26.7% |
Grade 12: | 112 | 23.7% | 112 | 23.8% | 113 | 23.2% | 122 | 24.7% | 124 | 25.1% | 126 | 25.0% | 108 | 21.1% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 250 | 52.9% | 246 | 52.3% | 254 | 52.2% | 256 | 51.8% | 243 | 49.2% | 248 | 49.2% | 254 | 49.5% |
Female: | 223 | 47.1% | 224 | 47.7% | 233 | 47.8% | 238 | 48.2% | 243 | 49.2% | 248 | 49.2% | 255 | 49.7% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.4% | 3 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.4% | 3 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.2% |
Asian: | 5 | 1.1% | 3 | 0.6% | 6 | 1.2% | 7 | 1.4% | 7 | 1.4% | 7 | 1.4% | 10 | 1.9% |
Hispanic: | 102 | 21.6% | 107 | 22.8% | 104 | 21.4% | 111 | 22.5% | 115 | 23.3% | 113 | 22.4% | 114 | 22.2% |
Black: | 3 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.6% |
White: | 354 | 74.8% | 348 | 74.0% | 369 | 75.8% | 373 | 75.5% | 368 | 74.5% | 379 | 75.2% | 385 | 75.0% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 7 | 1.5% | 6 | 1.3% | 4 | 0.8% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 150 | 31.7% | 159 | 33.8% | 170 | 34.9% | 197 | 39.9% | 177 | 35.8% | 128 | 25.4% | 117 | 22.8% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 31 | 6.6% | 36 | 7.7% | 39 | 8.0% | 30 | 6.1% | 48 | 9.7% | 41 | 8.1% | 31 | 6.0% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 18.56 | 18.94 | 18.34 | 15.83 | 17.27 | 17.60 | 16.50 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
ISAT | ||||||
2008 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.9% | 67.9% | 68.8% |
2009 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 17.1% | 17.1% | 40.7% |
2010 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.8% | 67.8% | 71.5% |
2011 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 70.1% | 72.6% |
2012 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 76% | 76.6% |
2013 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.7% | 74.7% | 72.3% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.7% | 81.7% | 76.7% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 46.9% | 46.9% | 44% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.4% | 81.4% | 76.8% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 88.1% | 78.5% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 88.4% | 78% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | 76.4% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 89.2% | 85.7% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 60% | 57.1% | 58.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 86.4% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 85.9% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 89.2% | 87.6% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 89.5% | 89.2% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 54.2% | 54.2% | 66.9% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 63.6% | 68.6% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 59.3% | 59.3% | 67.9% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.6% | 61.4% | 69.3% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 73% | 72.1% | 72.5% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.5% | 67.5% | 72.7% |
2009 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 29.4% | 29.4% | 26% |
2010 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 43.8% | 41.2% | 31.3% |
2011 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 29.4% | 27.8% | 26.4% |
2012 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 38.9% | 33.4% | 32.9% |
2013 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 30.8% | 26.7% | 23.5% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 33.3% | 23% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 38.5% | 35.7% | 31.6% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 28.6% | 28.6% |
2010 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 59.5% | 58.6% | 63.3% |
2011 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 67.4% | 64.6% | 62.8% |
2012 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 67.8% | 66.7% | 66.1% |
2013 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 67.8% | 65.8% | 62.4% |
2010 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 72.8% | 72.5% | 69.9% |
2011 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 76.1% | 73.5% | 69.5% |
2012 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 67.8% | 66.6% | 68.8% |
2013 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 74.2% | 66.6% |
2010 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 75.6% | 74.4% | 80.8% |
2011 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 83.3% | 81% |
2012 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 81% | 80.5% | 80.9% |
2013 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 90.7% | 90.3% | 82.3% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
Teacher's Experience and Compensation
2007 | |
Teachers with Bachelor Degree: | 72.0% |
Teachers with Master or PhD Degree: | 28.0% |
Mean Number of Years of Teaching: | 16.0 years |
Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | 20.0% |
Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | 80.0% |
Mean Base Salary: | $42,233.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | $30,602.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | $45,140.0 |
* Fruitland High School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.